Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 23 Sep 2008 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) ROLL CALL Adam Tambone * Anders Ekholm, Ericsson Barry Katz, SiSoft Benny Lazer Benjamin P Silva Bob Cox, Micron * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Brian Arsenault * David Banas, Xilinx * Eckhard Lenski, Nokia Siemens Networks Eric Brock Guan Tao, Huawei Technologies Gregory R Edlund Hazem Hegazy Huang Chunxing, Huawei Technologies John Figueroa John Angulo, Mentor Graphics Katja Koller, Nokia Siemens Networks Kevin Fisher Kim Helliwell, LSI Logic Lance Wang, IOMethodology Lynne Green * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Mayer, SiSoft * Moshiul Haque, Micron Technology * Pavani Jella, TI Peter LaFlamme Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Radovan Vuletic, Qimonda Robert Haller, Enterasys Roy Leventhal, Leventhal Design & Communications Sherif Hammad, Mentor Graphics Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Tom Dagostino, Teraspeed Consulting Group Kazuyoshi Shoji, Hitachi Sadahiro Nonoyama Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. AR Review: - Moshiul rewrite 5.4.5 to describe leading waveform delay requirements - Done, discussed today. New items: Continued review of the IBIS Quality Specification: - Mike: The currently posted IQ version is the 1.1ah draft - Mike has a 1.1ai version that will be posted after today's edits. 5.4.5. {LEVEL 3} Output and IO buffers should have 2 V-T tables - Checks 5.4.2 and 5.4.5 combined into one - The language has been clarified not to demand a 50 ohm R_fixture - IBISCHK checks final value settling value between waveforms and [Ramp]: - 2% offset generates a warning - 10% offset generates an error - The same amount of leading delay must be removed for all min curves: - This applies to typ and max, but independently. - Is 1 waveform OK? - The simulator has to guess the K-factor curve in this case - Variation between simulators is likely - Bob: HSPICE has a dynamic algorithm for the K-factor curve - Mike: One waveform is allowable where the termination scheme is pre-defined - Bob: Terminated topologies still can have 2 waveforms - The fixture voltages should be just above and below center - Moshiul: Only 1 waveform is needed for open-source and open-drain - Bob: I/V curves sometimes are far away from buffer switching characteristics - They represent end-point conditions only - Bob: We should not specify too much in the IQ checks - Compliant models may be deemed bad - Anders: Sometimes it is recommended to have only [Ramp], no waveforms - This is mostly for very high speed linear devices - Anders: Ramp should be checked against V-T data - In many models the [Ramp] data can be derived from waveforms - Not all models use the same fixture R and V as for [Ramp], but some do - Is this really a level 3 check? - It would be a level 2 check if problems would impact waveform simulation - It is level 3 if problems only impact timing - Mike: With V-T tables commented out, the simulation results change Next meeting: 30 Sep 2008 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) Meeting ended at 12:01 PM Eastern Time.